Hat Tip to Israellycool.com - The Lying Li'l Dickie

Jerusalem Post Mocks Little Dickie Silverstein

The Jerusalem Post has an article that "outs" the kapo Richard Silverstein. Silverstein has been devoting his blog lately to justifying the Nazi-like atrocity by Islamofascists in Mumbai. After all, says Little Dickie, the terrorists were only anti-Zionist, not anti-Semitic!

Silverstein has never met an Israeli or a "Zionist" he does not wish to see blown up and murdered.

We suspect he runs about his Seattle home giving the mirrors little Nazi Sieg Heil salutes. See Little Dickie's pals marching against settler occupation in this photo: http://static.flickr.com/9/12815618_a1715693cf.jpg

Here are some comments from the Jerusalem Post:

Silverstein's article triggered an immediate and widespread war of words. Posting on the Guardian blog, one of the first protesters, "Lipschitz," said: "A non-Zionist rabbi and his wife lie dead, but it's not anti-Semitic because one of the terrorists says they wanted to avenge the suffering of Palestinians?! ... You give this wannabe mass-murderer the benefit of your doubt.
"How about I go out and murder a couple of black people because I'm angry with Mugabe? Or
Congo? Or Rwanda? Would that be racist? Does that help you to understand the idiocy of your moral bypass? ... "Al-Qaida declares itself to be anti-Semitic. They go out and kill Jews. If you want your local terrorist group to be allowed into the al-Qaida franchise then you have to do likewise. That's why this group kills Jews."
A poster named "Geary" posted sarcastic approval, "I agree with Mr. Silverspoon. It was all an entirely justified reaction to the continuing brutal Israeli occupation of Kashmir."
Alex Stein, an Israeli writer, posted on the Guardian blog: "In the midst of the maudlin clamor for explanation, one thing is clear: The terrorists wanted to kill Jews... And in choosing their target, they also gave the lie to the idea that this was some kind of proportionate response to the oppression of the Palestinians. If that was their agenda, they could have targeted the Israeli
Consulate. Instead, they attacked a Jewish communal center and in the process killed a Satmar Hasid, known for its virulent anti-Zionism."

...Using a similar tone, Silverstein addressed his detractors in a post on Engage: "Chew on this, my little Jewish holy warriors," before linking to an article that quotes the surviving Mumbai terrorist saying they "were sent with a specific mission of targeting Israelis to avenge atrocities on Palestinians." Writing on Engage, Israeli analyst and Jerusalem Post blog contributor Petra Marquardt-Bigman said it was important to counter Silverstein as "in addition to trying to claim he is the one to define what's Jewish-left-progressive, he also tries to define what coexistence between Jews and Muslims requires."

Little Dickie Defends the Mumbai Nazis - they were Not Anti-Semitic

As a public service, we are reprinting a blog entry from the Israellycool blog:
Silverstein Outdoes Himself

by Aussie Dave

Self-important windbag Richard Silverstein wants everyone to know that the Mumbai terrorists - who went out of their way to find the Jewish Chabad House
and murder Jews (in a city comprising approximately 18 million people, of which
about 5,000 are Jews) - were not anti-Semitic.

And he knows this because the terrorists never said even one anti-Semitic
word.
http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2008/12/05/the-jewish-jihadis/
In the Forward, an Indian who spoke for hours with the Chabad House terrorist never indicated in his report that anti-Semitic words were spoken to him.

Brilliant!

Somehow, the fact that the terrorists may never have said “kikes” to Rabbi and Rebbetzin Holtzberg and the other Jewish victims as they murdered them in cold blood is hardly compelling evidence of the absence of anti-Semitic intent. Then again, the fact that Silverstein has a blog and claims to know what he is talking about is not compelling evidence of the presence of intellect.

If you don’t believe me, read his post, which includes the words “Jewish jihadis” and a comparison between the Mumbai terrorists and the “Hebron pogromists” (his words - not mine - for the more violent of the Jewish residents of Hebron who despite their terrible actions have not murdered anyone).